Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Fidel Castro met in 1960:  The Real Canoe Escapade Revealed in Trudeau’s DVD Memoirs

Once upon a time in Canada, you and I were lied to, over and over again.  The Trudeau fairy tale is one long lie from start to end.  Official accounts of Trudeau’s 1960 canoe stunt off the Florida Keys are just one instance of the endless fabrications that have been sold as “history”.  Here is the real story, from Red Pierre, himself.

Communist Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Communist Dictator Fidel Castro reminisce together for Trudeau's Memoirs

Communist Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Communist Dictator Fidel Castro reminisce together for Trudeau’s Memoirs about their meeting together in 1960.  Castro is saying, You should have brought me “an aircraft carrier.”


Trudeau Memoirs - DVD set, co-produced with staff of the CBC

Trudeau Memoirs – DVD set, co-produced with staff of the CBC


UPDATE!Download Key West Canoe Coverage 1960 in a zip file.

Read the stories here:  Canadians Plan Canoe Trip To Cuba By Don Daniels.


FOREWORD:

When Did Pierre Trudeau and Fidel Castro
meet for the first time?

The Official Story:  they first met in 1976

Robert Wright, the author of Three Nights in Havana, contributed an opinion piece to The Globe and Mail on 26 November 2016, updated 11 April 2017; accessed 2 October 2019:  “Castro and Trudeau:  a famous, but also fraught friendship.”

In a three-paragraph segment, Wright establishes the “first time” Trudeau and Castro “crossed paths” (1970) and their subsequent alleged first meeting on a state visit to Cuba when Trudeau was prime minister:

“Pierre Trudeau’s and Fidel Castro’s paths crossed for the first time in 1970, when the Canadian government sought to negotiate the exile of members of the FLQ, who had kidnapped British trade commissioner James Cross.  Fidel Castro obliged the Canadian PM by providing a refuge, and in a private letter Mr. Trudeau later extended his heartfelt gratitude.

In January, 1976, when it looked as though the United States was about to lift its trade embargo and normalize relations between Washington and Havana, Pierre Trudeau embarked on a state visit to Cuba.  Practically from the moment he stepped off his Armed Forces Boeing 707, Mr. Trudeau, his wife Margaret and his newborn son Michel endeared themselves to Fidel Castro and vice-versa.  Three days later, it became obvious that the two leaders had become fast friends.”

The National Post is a bit more precise, although the title is half the length of the article:  “No, internet, Fidel Castro isn’t Trudeau’s real father.  The Canadian prime minister just really, really looks like him” by Tristin Hopper, February 14, 2017, 1:59 PM EST; Last Updated February 14, 2017 6:08 PM EST.  Accessed 2 October 2019.  Two paragraphs of note:

“Meanwhile, any personal contact between Castro and the Trudeaus was still years away.  By early 1971, the only real contact between the prime minister’s office and Cuba had been a 1970 exchange of letters during the October Crisis to arrange the exile of FLQ terrorists.

The spear-fishing trips, the ‘Viva Castro!’ speeches, the glowing descriptions in Margaret and Pierre’s autobiographies; those would all come following Pierre and Margaret Trudeau’s first meeting with Castro in 1976.”

The REAL Story:  Pierre and Fidel met in 1960

Sixteen years before their alleged first meeting in 1976, Pierre Elliott Trudeau “encountered” Fidel Castro while apparently only pretending to “fail” in a bid to row a three-man, home-made canoe to Havana.

The true historic moment is revealed in a 1-minute, 25-second clip from Volume I of Pierre Trudeau’s DVD Memoirs, featured at this page along with a transcript.

The voice-over is apparently by Terence McKenna, who according to the production credits at the end of the full-length installment, wrote and narrated the Trudeau Memoirs for this big-production 10-GB epic sold on DVD.

The documentary was produced by Les Productions La Fête Inc. in association with The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and La Société Radio-Canada (the French-language CBC) with the participation of Téléfilm Canada. Trudeau himself, interviewed in studio and filmed revisiting the scenes of his past with old red colleagues, Gérard Pelletier and Fidel Castro, collaborates in this production to commemorate his life.


Someone has put the whole first segment, Trudeau Memoirs V1, at Youtube.  The 1960 canoe-trip to Cuba is in that segment @ 36 minutes 24 seconds in.  If it’s missing from Youtube, you can view the full-length Volume 1 of the Memoirs here:  https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZrrlRkZ5why1k4EY14YrajWlWGWWbSfWDuy

If the canoe clip excerpt is missing from YouTube, you can view it here:  https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZTvlRkZDMpWknMeme5ODC7FHzkkxLhRt9S7

Download the canoe clip in a zip file.
 

TRANSCRIPT:

[ Male Voice-over by Terence McKenna: ]

Some of Trudeau’s travels in the 1950s contributed to his reputation as a radical.  He didn’t worry about it.  He attended an economics conference in Moscow and wrote about it for Le Devoir.1  He would eventually visit Communist China, and he came here to Cuba in the early days of the Castro regime.  All this at a time when anti-Communist hysteria was raging in North America.

His 1961 [sic] attempt to row a gerry-rigged canoe from Florida to Cuba was a source of great amusement to Fidel Castro, whom Trudeau encountered at the time, and with whom he eventually developed a close friendship.

[ A retired Trudeau, at a table with Castro, is heard reminiscing in Spanish. ]

[ Male Voice-over by Terence McKenna continues, clearly interpreting the Spanish conversation: ]

Trudeau was accused of trying to smuggle arms to the Cuban revolutionaries in his canoe.

Castro says it would have been more useful at the time if Trudeau had brought him an aircraft carrier.

[ Trudeau and Fidel embrace and take leave of each other. ]

[ Male Voice-over by Terence McKenna continues: ]

Trudeau’s trips to the Communist world and his reputation as a radical are amusing now; but back then, they had serious consequences.

– END CLIP –

The Year Trudeau met Castro was 1960, and
Here’s the Proof

Terence McKenna says “1961” is the year of Trudeau’s “attempt to row a gerry-rigged canoe from Florida to Cuba”.  The year is wrong.  It could have been a typographical error, or a slip while McKenna was reading the script he wrote.  But, the canoe stunt and the Quebec election of Jean Lesage both took place in 1960.  I have an article here on that election:  “June 22nd 1960 — the Election of Jean Lesage”.  Also see:  “The Quebec Elections of 1960 – Lesage Minority ‘Liberals’ Make First Attempt at a Communist Plan”.

Other Trudeau biographers and sources on Trudeau confirm the canoe escapade took place in 1960.  Here are some of them:

Max and Monique Nemni, two official biographers of Pierre Trudeau (and two fellow Reds), confirm the year of the canoe escapade was 1960 in Trudeau Transformed: The Shaping of a Statesman 1944-1965.  (Volume Two of Trudeau, Son of Quebec, Father of Canada, translated by George Tombs, A Douglas Gibson Book, McClelland & Stewart, 2011)  They also identify Trudeau’s two rowing companions:

“With all this excitement, one might think that Trudeau would stay in Quebec, at least until the elections.  But no.  He threw himself into a crazy scheme, dreamed up and meticulously organized by Alphonse Gagnon, director of Gagnon Frères, a Chicoutimi furniture store.  On April 29, 1960, the Key West Citizen of Florida reported that three men — Alphonse Gagnon, Pierre Trudeau, and Val Francoeur — planned to take a canoe from Florida to Cuba in twenty-four hours:  ‘The technique calls for one man paddling in conventional fashion while another lies backward in the boat and rows with oars attached to his feet.  The third man rests.  They plan shifts of two hours on the oars and one resting and will switch positions for each shift.’  These daredevils for­tunately took the precaution of being escorted by another boat.  On Monday, May 2, the Montreal Star reported the adventure had come to an end:  They had covered 50 miles of the 90 miles distance across the rough Florida straights (sic) when they quit Saturday night.  The three said they would have continued if the salt water had not put their flash­lights out of commission.  They feared they might lose their escort boat in the darkness.’  Trudeau returned to Quebec and became active once more in the struggle to bring about democracy in Quebec.”

The millionaires brought flashlights that weren’t water-proof on a sea-going exploit.  Sure.

Before we move on, I have to clarify, When the Nemnis say “Trudeau returned to Quebec and became active once more in the struggle to bring about democracy in Quebec,” they mean “industrial democracy,” also called “participation” or “worker control,” the form of communism at that time in Tito’s Yugoslavia and long promoted in Canada by the NDP (Trudeau’s first political party).  This is the same “participation” referred to in Quand nous seront vraiment chez nous (I now call my English, “When we are truly on our own”); see my translation of the 1972 PQ manifesto, linked in the sidebar.  This is what the “separatists” (communists) have been working on for decades and still is the goal today:  third-world Communism for Canada.)  Sometimes, things are so bad, all I can do is make a cartoon about them; this link is caricature and satire based on the truth (industrial democracy):  Jagmeet Singh, the NDP and World Government.

Back to the canoe.  I contacted the Key West Citizen of Florida newspaper, hoping to buy a scan of their article, and any follow-up.  However, the Citizen hasn’t got those old issues any more.  Library and Archives Canada claims not to have them, either.  Local Key West libraries also claimed they were not on microfilm, which despite the listing to 1976 only goes to 1954.

The Montreal Star article quoted by the Nemnis was titled:  “Stormy Seas Spell Defeat for Canoeists”.  It appeared on Monday May 2nd, 1960 on page 49.  The issue is preserved on Microfilm:  Roll 664, The Montreal Star, 1960 May 1-15, NJ.FM.821, AMICUS No. 8404664 by Preston Microfilming Services, 2215 Queen St., East, Toronto, Ontario, M4E 1E8.

Robert Wright, in his book, Three Nights in Havana, excerpted for the National Post (Latest Edition) on 28 Apr 2007 as “Halfway to Havana” (Press Reader) notes:

“On the first day of May 1960, just a year after Fidel Castro’s visit to Montreal, two 40-something Canadian millionaires and a 30-something friend set out to paddle a homemade canoe from Key West to Havana.”

The Ottawa Citizen of January 12, 2008 confirms the year as 1960:

“On the first day of May 1960, Trudeau and two other Montrealers tried to paddle a home-made canoe from Key West to Havana.  No match for the powerful currents, pound­ing waves and blistering sun of the Strait of Florida, the three exhausted Canadians agreed to abandon the crossing the next day.”

Trudeau’s other official biographer, John English (fellow member of the CIIA, Canadian branch of the international bankers’ world-government front in London, the RIIA, headquarters of the Rhodes Scholarships—the CFR in the USA being a “sister institute”), confirms the canoe-trip year as 1960:

“Certainly, he made himself difficult to contact — a small canoe in the middle of the ocean could not have been more impossible to reach — as the forces of opposition to Duplessis swelled behind Lesage and his team.

Once the Cuban canoe escapade was over, Trudeau returned to Montreal and wrote an editorial in Cité Libre  that appeared before the election of Jean Lesage on June 22, 1960.”

Nino Ricci, in his ‘Extraordinary Canadians:  Pierre Elliott Trudeau,’ confirms the canoe escapade took place during the 1960 election campaign in Quebec:

“Even Cite Libre  was slipping from him, caught up in a factionalism to which his own anti-nationalist views had given rise.  The moment had come for change, and he had not been part of it.  When the chance had come to replace the Union Nationale after Duplessis’s death, several of Trudeau’s colleagues and friends had run for the Lesage Liberals as René Lévesque had.  Trudeau, however, had been down in Key West during the campaign, attempting to paddle to Cuba in a homemade canoe.  Lévesque later claimed that Trudeau, too, had been asked to run, but others said he had never been approached.”

And, one more time:  the naive Edith Iglauer, who gushes over Trudeau, is recorded by The Free Library in “Pierre Trudeau: Champion of a Just Society” (Circa 2000):

“The attraction of Cuba for Trudeau began as early as 1960, when he made a legendary if unsuccessful attempt when he was forty with two Montreal friends to row in an experimental canoe from Key West, Florida, to Havana.  Trudeau is said to have lain on his back in the vessel, working oars with his feet while his two companions steered and rowed with what would appear in photographs to be traditional oars.  The second morning out, about half way across the turbulent Florida Straits, three very seasick men gave up.”

As we now know from his DVD Memoirs, the “attempt” was indeed “successful”:  for “Trudeau encountered” Castro at the time.

In his book, Three Nights in Havana, excerpted for the National Post (Latest Edition) on 28 Apr 2007 as “Halfway to Havana”, author Robert Wright sums up the canoe stunt:

“When he [Trudeau] was fished out of the Straits of Florida on that balmy spring day in 1960, he betrayed no disappointment about the failed crossing.  ‘That would call for a demonstration of emotion,’ re­called Don Newlands, the cam­eraman in the shrimp boat, ‘and that was not in him.’”

Trudeau “encountered” Castro on “May Day,” 1960

If Trudeau, according to Newlands, “betrayed no disappointment about the failed crossing,” perhaps he had not been disappointed; because the canoe trip was the front and not the objective; the objective being achieved.  And that was for Trudeau to meet Castro at a critical moment in Canada’s history being crafted by these two men.  The claim the trip had “failed” would avert all risk of Trudeau’s later being linked with Castro’s FLQ, once it emerged.  For, Castro was recruiting and training the terrorists to be loosed on Canada when Trudeau and he had their “encounter” … apparently on “May Day”.

And what is May Day? 

Observed in many countries to celebrate the coming of spring, May Day is observed in Russia and related countries in honour of labour.  A telegram sent by Jean-Louis Gagnon to a Communist May-Day rally in Montreal on May 1st, 1946 illustrates the importance of May Day to Communists.  Here is the English translation published by Alan Stang in the John Birch Society’s offprint of Stang’s April 1st, 1971 “CANADA” article in American Opinion (look for my post, “Singing tomorrows”):

“On this first post-war victorious May Day we
can foresee the victory of the working
class STOP Fraternal greetings to all trade
union leaders STOP Let us go forward to Peace STOP
Long live the glorious Soviet Union STOP Long live
singing tomorrows
STOP”

Personally, I prefer the classic definition: “An internationally recognized distress signal via radiotelephone (from the French m’aider, “help!”)”.

What are the odds that Trudeau and friends were cruising over the Strait to Communist Cuba … on May Day … just as a lark to ridicule the Balseros (more below)?

When Pierre ascended the Throne of Canada, Stang reports he “created Information Canada, named Gagnon to run it at $40,000 a year. … And he (Jean-Louis Gagnon) is a dues-paying member of the Communist Party.”

Fred Rose, a Soviet spy convicted of espionage and jailed for treason was Gagnon’s boss in the Party.  Igor Gouzenko, who defected from the Soviet Embassy in Ottawa, revealed that Jean-Louis Gagnon had supplied Soviet Colonel Zabotin with the information that the exact date of D-Day was June 6, 1944.

D-Day was the date of the Allied landing in France in World War II.  World War II is another kettle of fish.  What misguided country would enter a war with Stalin as their ally?  But, anyway.

We have, I think, corrected Terence McKenna’s typographical error.  The sentence he wrote now reads:

“His 1960 attempt to row a gerry-rigged canoe from Florida to Cuba was a source of great amusement to Fidel Castro, whom Trudeau encountered at the time.”


THE REAL VEHICLE TO HAVANA WAS
THE “ESCORT BOAT” (OBVIOUSLY)

Pierre Trudeau sets out on May, 1960, canoe trip from Key West to Havana

Pierre Trudeau sets out with two companions on his unsuccessful (sic) May, 1960, canoe trip from Key West to Havana.  PressReader, “Halfway to Havana” by Robert Wright.

In our final extract above, from “Halfway to Havana,” author Robert Wright confirms that the Nemnis’ “escort boat” for the canoeists was indeed a “shrimp boat”.  Shrimp boats off the Keys in 1960 looked like this:

Two girls standing in front of shrimp boats - Key west, Florida. Two girls standing in front of shrimp boats - Key west, Florida.

“Two girls standing in front of shrimp boats – Key west, Florida.”  Photographed in February, 1960.  Source:  Barron, Charles Lee, 1917-1997. Two girls standing in front of shrimp boats – Key west, Florida. 1960. Black & white photoprint, 4 x 5 in. State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory. , accessed 1 October 2019.

There were only two vehicles on the Straits according to every version of the story:  the home-made “gerry-rigged” canoe, and a “shrimp boat”.

Based on that information, there is only one conclusion.  The shrimp boat, the escort boat, made it to Havana late in the day on May 1st, 1960.  Or Trudeau met Castro far out at sea off the radar.

“The Donald Gordon Incident” (November-December 1962)

“The Donald Gordon Incident” (November-December 1962)

The failed canoe stunt is a fairy tale, a cover-up for the real expedition on the shrimp boat, precisely to meet Castro.  The date of that meeting fits in perfectly with the timeline my research is producing.  I have Pierre Elliott Trudeau and his communist friends in league with the federal government to revolutionize Quebec by a referendum in the early 1960s.  My research post, in development, centers on the false-flag event we call “The Donald Gordon Incident” (November-December 1962).  Another name for it might be, the communist mobilization of the non-communist population.

(The “DGI” was scripted by Trudeau, published in his pro-Soviet CITE LIBRE in early 1961, play-acted by Canada’s number one bureaucrat, Donald Gordon, pulled off by the federal government and a parliamentary committee, with Trudeau’s Communist friends running both major French dailies who escalated it with riots and near-riots led by Trudeau’s Marxist law student, Bernard Landry, and by communists in the street.  That is how the Reds got a “royal commission” they could use to crack the Constitution and replace it; that’s how the Red carpet was unrolled to bring in the FLQ to sharpen the need to break Confederation.  And the reason, as always:  You need all the powers to construct a Communist Plan.  An independent State of Quebec would have had all the powers.  Subscribe and look for it.)

The story told in the DVD Memoirs, that the US Coast Guard suspected the men of trying to “smuggle arms in their canoe” is a cartoon to make you laugh and stop thinking.

Referring once again to author Robert Wright in his excerpt for the National Post “Halfway to Havana”:

“When he [Trudeau] was fished out of the Straits of Florida on that balmy spring day in 1960, he betrayed no disappointment about the failed crossing.  ‘That would call for a demonstration of emotion,’ re­called Don Newlands, the cam­eraman in the shrimp boat, ‘and that was not in him.’”

But, Trudeau wasn’t “disappointed.”  The crossing didn’t “fail.”  Trudeau’s DVD Memoirs tell us he “encountered” Castro “at the time”.

THE ATMOSPHERE IN CUBA IN 1960

The Trudeau canoe stunt was a gesture of ridicule toward people who were desperately trying to escape the communist-humanist paradise of Fidel Castro.  Thousands of Cubans are reported to have drowned in the attempt to flee.

Before the boat people of Vietnam, there were the Balseros of Cuba.

Before the boat people of Vietnam, there were the Balseros  of Cuba.  Tens of thousands of them left the island on rafts made from recycled materials.  Thousands of them perished at sea.

Blogger Richard Martineau, in “Le penchant de Pierre Trudeau et de ses fils pour la tyrannie” (“The fondness of Pierre Trudeau and his sons for tyranny”) describes the Cuba toward which Trudeau and friends were rushing via canoe and shrimp boat in May of 1960.  Says Martineau:

En 1960, alors que des milliers de Cubains assoiffés de liberté bravaient la mer à bord d’embarcations de fortune, Trudeau, lui, a fait le chemin inverse :  il a tenté de joindre Cuba à bord d’un canot en partance de la Floride !

In 1960, when thousands of Cubans thirsting for liberty braved the sea aboard makeshift rafts, Trudeau was going the other way:  he tried to reach Cuba aboard a canoe bound from Florida!

(Rappelons qu’en 1960, on a répertorié 631 condamnations à mort, 146 fusillés et 70 000 prisonniers politiques à Cuba.  Pour le respect des droits de la personne, on repassera …)

(Remember that in 1960, there were 631 death sentences, 146 executions by firing squad and 70,000 political prisoners inventoried in Cuba.  As to respect for individual rights, we’ll skip it …)

SCHOETERS:  FLQ LEADER IN CUBA 1960

 

Georges Schoeters, Teaching Assistant, Université de Montréal

Georges Schoeters, Teaching Assistant, Université de Montréal


Louis Fournier, a Sorbonne-trained French-Canadian journalist and partisan of the Marxist left, called jailed FLQ terrorists “political prisoners”  We already know that both Schoeters and René Lévesque met Castro in Montreal at the end of April 1959.  Fournier documents the sequel to the Schoeters meeting:  the beginning of training in Cuba for Schoeters, a future leader of the first cell of FLQ terrorists.  Said Fournier:

 

 

Georges Schœters est une sorte de marxiste humaniste, surtout tiers-mondiste.  Il a effectué un voyage à Cuba aux débuts de la révolution, en août 1959, en compagnie d’une douzaine d’étudiants de l’Université de Montréal où il vient de terminer sa scolarité de maîtrise en science économique.  Le groupe, invité par l’Institut national de la réforme agraire, a rencontré Fidel Castro et le commandant Camilo Cienfuegos.  À l’automne 1959, Schœters retourne à Cuba pour travailler pendant quelques mois à la réforme agraire.  Il y rencontre alors Che Guevara.”

Georges Schœters is a kind of Marxist humanist, above all a third-worldist.  He took a trip to Cuba at the beginning of the revolution, in August of 1959, accompanied by 10 students from the Université de Montréal  where he had just completed his Masters in Economics.2  The group, as guests of the Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agrariae (National Institute of Agrarian Reform), met Fidel Castro and commandant Camilo Cienfuegos.  In the Fall of 1959, Schœters returned to Cuba to work for a few months at agrarian reform.  At that time, he met Che Guevara.”

In Last Stop Paris:  The Assassination of Mario Bachand and the Death of the FLQ, author Michael McLoughlin places Georges Schoeters in Cuba in 1960.  Speaking of others (Raymond Villeneuve, Gaston Collin and André Garand), McLoughlin says:

“Three weeks later, the three would-be revolutionaries ran out of money and were taken under the wing of ICAP, the Cuban Insti­tute for the Support of Peoples, the organization that in 1960 gave hospitality to Georges Schoeters, two years before he became a founder of the FLQ.  They were given free room and board and 250 pesos a month.  There was, of course, a price for such generosity.  ICAP was an arm of the Cuban Tourist Bureau, which was an arm of the General Intelligence Directorate (DGI), the Cuban intelli­gence service, so it was not a typical tourist agency.  One of its roles was to invite to Cuba foreigners who had the potential to become agents of influence after they returned home.”

CONCLUSIONS

Pierre Elliott Trudeau met Castro on May Day in 1960 while the first cell of the Communist Front de Libération du Québec  was being hand-picked and groomed in Cuba.  Why admit it now?  At the end of his life, his vanity got the better of him.  He wanted to leave a note at the scene of his crime, in grand contempt for those he had betrayed.  The victims he had charmed with his lies would surely never notice it.

This admission, in Trudeau’s DVD Memoirs, shatters the Trudeau myth.  He manipulated his way to power to consummate from above the treason he commenced below.

Pierre had a busy year in 1960.  First, he met Castro who was organizing the FLQ to attack Canada.  Then he got the Reds to vote Liberal when Jean Lesage was planning a communist regime for Quebec and a referendum to secede to do it.  Then Pierre went to Beijing to celebrate the victory of the Reds imposing their power on mainland China.  That was not a State visit.  That was a personal visit by Communist Pierre, supporting his own cause.

EL TERRORISMO

This is the dictator that Pierre and Margaret found charming and sexy when they allegedly “first met” him, the year Castro was filmed below (1976):

TRANSCRIPT:

EL TERRORISMO
(We Warn You)

[Fidel Castro:]  “If the Cuban government were to dedicate time to doing terrorism, and to respond with terrorism to terrorism, we believe that we would really be very effective terrorists.”

[Audience:  wild applause (compulsory)]

“Let no one be mistaken.  If we were to dedicate ourselves to terrorism, with all certainty, we would be very effective.  But the fact that the Cuban Revolution has never applied terrorism, doesn’t mean that we never will.

We warn you.”

[Credits:]  Discurso de Fidel Castro por el 15to aniversario del MININT en el Teatro Carlos Marx, La Haban, 6 de junio del 1976.

Discourse of Fidel Castro on the 15th anniversary of the MININT, in the Karl Marx Theatre at Havana on 6 June 1976.

The Ministero del Interior (known as MININT) is Cuba’s state agency responsible for internal security.

In Canada on 26 April 1959, Belgian immigrant Georges Schoeters met Fidel Castro at the Montreal Airport.  Schoeters would go three times to Cuba to be trained by Castro to set up the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ) and recruit other terrorists.

English translation by cubacenter The Center for a Free Cuba (CFC) at YouTube.

MUSIC:  Life is So Short.
Artist:  Shane Newville
Album:  Beats Collection Vol. 1

Thanks, again, to cubacenter, for the great translation.  A decade later, it still packs a punch.  This video was produced at Montreal on 21 April in 2009.

For more information on the planned end of Canada, visit:

HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
http://www.habeascorpuscanada.com

__________
1. Trudeau’s 1952 7-part series on the Moscow conference is now available in English from NoSnowInMoscow, and also at AntiCommunist ArchiveI’m Back From Moscow, by Pierre Elliott Trudeau (1952).

2. “A very interesting Belgian source online who did in-depth research published in 2013, says that Schoeters finished his Masters while in prison for an FLQ bombing that took a life.  Christophe Lamfalussy of La Libre Belgique says that on early release, Schoeters was put on a plane and expelled from Canada on 25 September 1967.  Then, in 1968, (translation):  “Schoeters obtained his Masters in Economics from the Université de Montréal because he had been able to pursue his studies in prison.”  (“Georges Schoeters, le Belge qui voulait libérer le Québec”).  Schoeters therefore did not have a Masters when he went to work for Castro.  We have a battle of sources here, and frankly, I’m more inclined to Mr. Lamfalussy because unlike Fournier, the Belgian doesn’t appear to have an agenda.  Lamfalussy in French:  “Schoeters obtient cette année-là de l’université de Montréal une maîtrise en sciences économiques car, en prison, il avait pu poursuivre ses études.”

– 30 –

“The Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s Flying Saucers”:  Season’s Greetings from Paul Hellyer … and the Skull & Bones?


“I don’t know if you’re a person who’s ever read the Bible or not, but I think the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers.”

Download this video clip:  https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=kZWPhxZP6NwN7FH4EzWRsoloq4uhygBviqV
 


 
‘Twas the Night Before Christmas, and all through the stars, alien life forms were stirring from the Dipper to Mars …

Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, and more entertaining.  Paul Hellyer is a former National Defense Minister under Soviet Agent Lester Pearson and then under Red Mole Pierre Trudeau.  Hellyer founded the Canadian Action Party (the CAP) in 1997 to put the sovereignty of Canada up to a vote1

He and his former successor as leader of the CAP, well known Communist Connie Fogal-Rankin, would like the Canadian parliament to have a “democratic mandate” from the Canadian people for the North American Union.  (The BNA Act of 1867 prohibits North American Union, so these cons have introduced the forbidden as an “option”.)

However, the deeper truth behind the Canadian Action Party is truly bizarre. 2  And there is no way to spoof it for you to celebrate Christmas-New Year’s 2016-2017, other than to expose the truth.

Therefore, listen to Paul Theodore Hellyer — on Russian TV to boot (Putin’s favorite propaganda channel) — when he tells the cameras:

“I think the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers.”

Hellyer’s interviewer, Sophie Shevardnadze, evidently perplexed, can only reply, “Uhum” to the news that a flying saucer had hovered over Bethlehem to announce the birth of Jesus.

But that mythic scenario fits precisely into the intergalactic-theocratic-Urantia cult behind Paul Hellyer’s Canadian Action Party.

I think the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers

Paul Hellyer:  “I think the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers.”

 
When Hellyer says, “one of God’s flying saucers”, he is referring to the Book of Urantia peddled by Canadian Action Party president Paul Kemp.

In its internal, non-public culture, Hellyer’s Canadian Action Party supports a one-world government, a globalist religion (Urantia), alien-human hybridization, and membership of the Earth (real name, Urantia) in an interplanetary federation.  The scam is that Earth must have world government in order to be admitted to the federation.

Add to this an intergalactic Jesus incarnated throughout the infinite alien-populated worlds advanced as “fact” and “truth” in Paul Kemp’s presentation of the Urantia Book, and you start to see why Hellyer would announce:  “the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers.”

The Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group are presumed by Urantia “believers” at CAP to have received “alien contact”.  This is why these sainted organizations, run by the world’s worst Evilarchy, are motivated to form a one-world government:  so that Earth can join “galactic society”.

One such believer is Paul Kemp’s friend, retired U.S. Air Force Lt.-Col Don Ware, who admits to channeling telepathic aliens.  Ware is said to have claimed: 

“In 1989, after studying and learning more about the non-physical aspects of the universe, I was used by a higher intelligence to send a message to the generals at Eglin Air Force Base.”

Also, says Ware:

“I accept the idea that intelligent life is abundant throughout the universe, in both incarnate and discarnate forms”

“the normal means of communication by higher intelligence is telepathic”

“Millions of Americans are participating in a hybridization program with short beings from Zeta Reticula.”

“The main reason alien liaison is increasing now is because our planet is being transformed to support a new world order.”

Notice anything familiar yet?

Ware continues:

“The new order is destined to support a learning process that is one step beyond the human experience of free-will choices.”

A world Marxist dictatorship is “one step beyond” “free-will choices”.  Coincidence?  Give up your free will for the greater good of the intergalactic collective!  Just what we need!  Space aliens who are Marxists!  Perhaps Karl channeled the Manifesto from telepathic Zeta Reticulans?

“… the new world order can become what Jesus described as heaven on Earth.”

The Warburg-financed Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, viewed by many as the founding father of the European Union (first chunk of the world-government system laid in place) said in his 1925 book, Practical Idealism:

Through the ages Jewry has remained faithful to the theocratic idea of the identification of politics and ethics:  Christianity and Socialism are both attempts to create an earthly paradise.  [lit.:  a State of God]  Now, the Kemp web sites prominently feature the Star of David and the flag of Israel in the Urantia scheme for an intergalactic federation of world-governments.

Don Ware continues:

“I think the Bilderburgers [sic], the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations in America is influenced by alien liaison.”

“I think many members of these groups recognize that having a government that can speak for all of the people of the world is a prerequisite to joining a galactic society.”

“Economies are coalescing into three major economic blocks, and advanced communication and transportation systems are allowing a great inter-mingling of societies.”

The Urantia cult is a spinoff from the 7th-Day Adventists who themselves spun off David Koresh’s Messianic Branch Davidians.  The Branch Davidians met their tragic end in a bloody FBI siege in 1993 at Waco, Texas.  (It is alleged that Hillary Rodham Clinton ordered the massacre.)

Waco (wacko?) is also the home of the alleged Bush-Fox-Martin signature in 2005 of a non-released document behind the “Security and Prosperity Partnership” of North America, to complete a regional union (“regionalism is Communism”, says Charlotte Iserbyt of NewsWithViews) on the pretext of 9/11.

The “Urantia Book” behind the cult is a faked “religious” document “channeled” by a member of the Kellogg family.  The same family produced at least four members of the ominous “Skull & Bones” secret society.

The object of the Urantia cult is world government for the Earth (Urantia), where the Earth is just one among an infinite number of planets in an interstellar federation of planets, each with its own world government.  The aliens inhabiting these “worlds of space” are all portrayed as “higher intelligences”, “advanced beings” whom we Urantians ought to emulate.

At the center of the whole federation is God on the middle planet.  Which explains the reference of Paul Hellyer in the news clip to “one of God’s flying saucers”.  This is pure Urantia Book.  (And no, we don’t know yet if God is David Rockefeller.)

So the purpose for pretending to “channel” a 2000-page book to kick-start a new religion might well be sinister.

And, sinister it is when you discover the passages in the Urantia Book (the cult’s “Bible”) demanding a one-world government.

Now, world government is what the Canadian Action Party claims to oppose when addressing the public.  But, one-world government is a religious  tenet of the UFO cult manically pursued behind the scenes by Canadian Action Party founder Paul Hellyer and his conspiratorial Executive members.

The Canadian Action Party’s president, Paul Kemp, literally preaches Urantia on and off-line (see his Facebook page and his collection of “other worlds of space” web sites linked below).  According to Kemp, the Urantia Book says:

134:6.4  Another world war will teach the so-called sovereign nations to form some sort of federation, thus creating the machinery for preventing small wars, wars between the lesser nations.

The malign intelligence behind the words “will teach” in that passage is too startling to be ignored.  In the past few years, self-styled analyst Joel M. Skousen, nephew of W. Cleon Skousen who published The Naked Communist and The Naked Capitalist, has been warning that “they are planning a war for us”.

Says Skousen to Alex Jones, in the advertising film for his book Strategic Relocation (drumming up business for Skousen’s profession installing hi-tech nuclear bomb shelters for the mobile rich):

“Well, part of it is that they don’t understand the nature of the conspiracy.  They don’t understand that there is a great powerful force not only to take down Liberty, which is what their agenda is, but to make sure that they don’t get the blame for it.

So, they are going to use — they blame it on anyone, they blame it on the free market, they blame it on “business cycle”.  It’s not the business cycle, it’s the monetary cycle created by the Fed.

And ultimately, these people are going to escape blame, because they are planning a war for usA third world-warA nuclear war.  Which in fact will wipe out a great deal of the financial centers and will let them to walk away and say, ‘It wasn’t our fault’.”

“The Fed” is the U.S. Federal Reserve bank, which is not a national bank but a private bank.  The Federal Reserve is composed of all the same banking interests behind the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) which for over a century has engineered all the major wars, including World Wars I and II, financing both sides.

The goal of this Bankers’ protection racket was to push the free nations of the world to the bargaining table, there to create a world government.  With the creation of the United Nations Organization in 1945, stage one has been accomplished.  The table has been laid.  Stage two is underway, and Hellyer and Company are playing “the alien card“.

We therefore have currently playing out before us, an apparently Marxist, Bankster-friendly Urantia UFO cult, hybridized with Christianity and with Zionist forces.  For Paul Kemp’s Urantia web sites all use the Star of David and the flags of Israel and the United Nations as twin pennons of the desired World Order over Earth in an interplanetary federation.

All are pushing naive people to accept, on religious faith, the spirituality and “goodness” of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, his Marxist Council on Foreign Relations, and his pro-Communist Bilderbergers.

Enameled onto this religious tenet is the requirement that Urantia believers agree that national sovereignty is poisonous, and the cause of wars.

National sovereignty is not the cause of wars; the Bankers are the cause of wars.  Wars could not be fought without financing.  It is well known that the Rothschild bankers have financed both sides in most European wars for hundreds of years.  They financed both sides in the last Napoleonic War, and capitalized on their advance knowledge of Napoleon’s defeat, to trick the British markets into a panic so the Rothschilds could buy up stock at rock-bottom prices.  As a consequence, it is hotly rumored, the Rothschilds thus acquired control of the Bank of England.

Another passage from the Urantia Book, as posted by the CAP’s Paul Kemp, gives a very strong hint as to who is really behind this phony religion and UFO cult:

134:6.11  Under global government the national groups will be afforded a real opportunity to realize and enjoy the personal liberties of genuine democracy.  The fallacy of self-determination will be ended.  With global regulation of money and trade will come the new era of world-wide peace.  Soon may a global language evolve, and there will be at least some hope of sometime having a global religion — or religions with a global viewpoint.

Let me read a little from Vladimir Lenin’s Collected Works, page 499, Volume 19, March-December 1913 in a letter to S.G. Shahumyan of December 6th, 1913:

“Why will you not understand the psychology that is so important in the national question and which, if the slightest coercion is applied, besmirches, soils, nullifies the undoubtedly progressive importance of centralisation, large states and a uniform language?”

Lenin continues, linking his view of how a global language must “evolve” spurred by the development of a “capitalist” economy:

“But the economy is still more important than psychology:  in Russia we already have a capitalist economy, which makes the Russian language essential.  But you have no faith in the power of the economy and want to prop it up with the crutches of the rotten police regime.”

Apparently, Paul Hellyer and the Canadian Action Party are propping up Marxist world government on the crutches of a phony UFO cult.

On the topic of “democracy”, Lenin had this to say in his September 7th, 1913 article in Pravda (page 357, Vol. 19, Collected Works), although when Lenin says “alien” he probably doesn’t have in mind the inducement to world government promoted by Hellyer.

“Working-class democracy counterposes to the nationalist wrangling of the various bourgeois parties over questions of language, etc., the demand for the unconditional unity and complete solidarity of workers of all nationalities in all working-class organisations — trade union, co-operative, consumers’, educational and all others — in contradistinction to any kind of bourgeois nationalism.  Only this type of unity and solidarity can uphold democracy and defend the interests of the workers against capital — which is already international and is becoming more so — and promote the development of mankind towards a new way of life that is alien to all privileges and all exploitation.”

But what of the Canadian Action Party’s “global religion”!  Have the Marxists conceded the value of blending the behavioral goals of their materialist religion with the enforcement function of religion over “primitive instincts” to free choice and self-determination?

Perhaps Maurice Strong will emerge with a more complex version of Urantia, itself, linked to phony man-made “climate change”?

Urantia is pretty deadly stuff; and it’s targeted to securing compliance with a Bankster-engineered overthrow of Western Civilization by a naive element of that same population.

Basically, when the views that the Evilarchy wants people to hold become tenets held on faith; they are no longer open to challenge in the real world outside that hypnotically wobbling orb of the imaginary universe created by Urantia around its advocates.

The Urantia cult as promoted by Heller converts the Banksters and their Marxist Council on Foreign Relations, their Trilateral Commission and extended networks into collaborators of Christ to create a world government “paradise” on Earth, as part of an intergalactic federation where it is possible to voyage to the middle planet and meet God; (or perhaps David Rockefeller).

Bloggers including Tim Boucher have questioned whether Hellyer has lost his mind.  Indeed, I believe there is calculated method to Hellyer’s apparent madness.  His “far out” Urantia cult enables a real political power grab advanced through mind control exerted over a fringe element with limited capacities for critical judgment.

As for me, I’m betting that “God” will turn out to be a trans-humanized, brain-transplanted Evelyn de Rothschild, ensconced upon the Divine Hijacked British Throne at the center of Kemp’s wacky Universe.

I hope the galactic truth about Paul Hellyer and the Canadian Action Party has set you free!

Merry Christmas, everybody, and a Cosmic New Year!

 
__________
 

Paul Kemp’s Facebook Page:

https://www.facebook.com/Paul8Kemp
 

A few of Paul Kemp’s Urantia web sites:

 
Other quick statements of Hellyer’s on alien contact:

DOWNLOAD:  https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZveBxZ0pvcPawBEtLBVW2IXmPogQP3oHFV
Hellyer:  Decades Ago, Aliens Wanted to Help Us!
 

DOWNLOAD:  https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZ4nBxZdPYMppxfzA4vCJ0kM215I7dnBzGV
Hellyer:  Has America Developed Flying Saucers?
 

DOWNLOAD:  https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZbnBxZeqtN8137TjYQmjpo6EaV301MYf7k
Hellyer:  “Paranoid” Military Disdain Aliens as “Partners in Development”
 

For another fun read, look for “The Canadians are getting ready for the aliens.  Are you?” by “The New Tim Boucher” posted on November 27, 2005 at 2:53, now in The Wayback Machine.
 
__________
 
1  In 2003, Paul Hellyer tried to merge the Canadian Action Party with the New Democratic Party of Canada (NDP).  The NDP has always been a full member of the Socialist International (SI), whose platform is world government (Oslo Declaration, 1962).  The fact that Hellyer tried to merge the CAP with the NDP proves that Hellyer is in favor of world government.

The text of the Declaration of the Socialist International endorsed at the Council Conference held in Oslo on 2-4 June 1962, is online at the web site of the SI, itself.

Source: http://www.socialistinternational.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticleID=2133

Backup @ Calameo: http://en.calameo.com/books/000747447c87ba69f7cac

It says:

“SOCIALISM AND WORLD PEACE

“The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government. As a first step towards it, they seek to strengthen the United Nations so that it may become more and more effective as an instrument for maintaining peace.”

 
2  Back around 2009, a concerned member of the Canadian Action Party who was inside and able to observe the “pro” world government activity of the CAP and its Urantia UFO cult, began to leak documents on these hypocrites who were pretending to save Canada’s “sovereignty”.

Thank you very much to Terry Le Blanc, Former Organizational Chair for the Canadian Action Party, for leaking all those nuggets on Hellyer, Fogal, Moulden, and the CAP’s world-government Urantia cult.  Merry Christmas, Terry!  Sadly, Terry’s pages are no longer online, not even in The Wayback Machine.

 

French-Canadian Marksman and FLQ hanger-on was the Spitting Image of Alleged Killer Oswald

Who Killed Kennedy?
And Who Killed Kennedy’s Killer’s Look-Alike?

Bachand or Oswald?

Lineup:  Bachand?  Oswald?

Can you pick Oswald out of this line-up?
Can you pick François Mario Bachand out of this lineup?

 

Fidel Castro & the assassination
of John Fitzgerald Kennedy

Fidel Castro founded the Quebec terrorist movement, the FLQ, which he began to set up with Belgian immigrant to Montreal (and possibly KGB agent) Georges Schoeters, during a meeting between them in Montreal in early 1959.  FLQ is short for Front de Libération du Québec  (Quebec Liberation Front).

Castro’s 1959 visit to Montreal was organized by a Quebec criminal lawyer, Robert Daoust, whose primary client is later known to be the Cotroni mob.  Whether Daoust worked for Cotroni at the time he brought in Castro is unconfirmed.  However, it would be interesting to know, since the Cotronis had a special interest in the Liberal Party of Canada.  And it was the Liberals under Soviet agent Pearson, who used the existence of the FLQ and its 1960s bombing spree as a pretext in 1967 to order the set-up of the Parti Québécois (PQ).  These referendums benefit the Communist-controlled federal level of Canada, which can then appear to “save” Canada from Quebec “separatism” by negotiating the restructuring of all of Canada for Communism.

An American woman (Andrea Silverthorne) has a theory that an Oswald look-alike shot Kennedy because Oswald was not a marksman.  This is her solution to the “French connection” alleged in the Kennedy assassination.  Silverthorne suggests that Oswald double, François Mario Bachand, was a marksman.  He moreover hung out with actual FLQ terrorists, Silverthorne observes, which made him seem to be one of them … and might have been a cover for him.

Bachand was bailed out of jail by a newspaper reporter a couple of weeks before President John F. Kennedy was shot.  On release from jail, the Oswald look-alike promptly went underground.

Silverthorne identifies the French Canadian François Mario Bachand as possibly having shown up on-site in Texas for the shooting (grassy knoll), accompanied by his wife and small child.

Years later, in 1971, Bachand himself was assassinated execution-style, in Paris.  The execution occurred shortly after Soviet agent, Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, ordered it; which is a criminal act:  government is not entitled to murder a citizen in cold blood.  (Tell it to Barack Hussein Obama, who assumes a “presidential power” to exterminate American citizens, and other innocent bystanders).

Trudeau, who led a Communist delegation at Moscow in 1952 on Communist nickel 1, was a Communist like his predecessor, Soviet Agent LesterMikePearsonPearson had been exposed by former GRU (Soviet military intelligence), Elizabeth Bentley, in the U.S. McCarran hearings.  Despite written warnings from the FBI to the RCMP, Pearson steadily rose through the ranks.

Interest in the killing of Bachand deepens when we learn that the deed was “recommended” to Communist Trudeau by his fellow-Communist Jean-Pierre Goyer.  Said Alan Stang in 1971:

Pierre Elliott Trudeau made Jean-Pierre Goyer Solicitor-General for Canada …

“when Parliament was not in session and could not question him. … Goyer … has been involved in several pro-Communist fronts.  And he has attended Communist meetings behind the Iron Curtain.  Like his friend Trudeau, he is a revolutionary.”

It was alleged that Trudeau himself was to be a target of assassination on Bachand’s imminent return to Quebec.  Thus, the notion of a capability or intent for assassination was clearly associated with this Oswald look-alike.

In his chapter on “The Assassination of François Mario Bachand”, labor journalist Louis Fournier, in his F.L.Q.  Histoire d’un mouvement clandestin (1982) UQAM Editions Quebec/Amerique, 1982, 509 pp. (first published in French in 1982) states that:

[Translation:]  “[w]ithin the F.L.Q., the major Spring event is the assassination in Paris, on March 29th [1971], of François Mario [400] Bachand, one of the leaders-in-exile of the movement.  Bachand, aged 27, is found dead in his flat in Saint-Ouen in a working-class suburb of Paris, felled by two bullets from a 22-caliber revolver shot into the back of the neck at close range.  The matter has never been officially clarified.  Mario Bachand, who lived in semi-clandestinity, was getting ready to return to Quebec; he had taken steps in that direction with Maître Bernard Mergler.  He wanted to regularize his situation after having fled to Cuba in April 1969, while he was out on bail on altogether minor charges connected to “Operation McGill français” (the other accused had been cleared).  Still a partisan of the F.L.Q., he was nonetheless in disagreement with some of his comrades, due notably to his tactical support for the P.Q.

[…]

In a secret text written shortly before his death, Bachand would advocate that Québécois militants “move to total clandestinity” because the repression had become too strong.  “What is needed,” he said, “is to form selected armed groups, which will attack certain objectives at very precise moments.  In addition, it is necessary that a certain form of urban guerilla be maintained, for example bombs in anglophone neighborhoods, hold-ups, well timed executions of certain politically dangerous persons such as Jean Drapeau and Pierre Trudeau“, because the execution of Pierre Laporte constituted a “positive” gesture.

Trudeau’s execution order allegedly arose from concern that Bachand might be able to achieve his aim.  However, there is another reason clear from the same extract from Fournier why Trudeau would not have wanted Bachand to return to Quebec.  The “secret committee at Power” had ordered the set-up of the Parti Québécois to run referendums in Quebec as the “democratic” alternative to FLQ violence.  With the PQ holding seven seats in the Quebec Legislature in 1970, and hopes on the rise for an early referendum, the last thing Trudeau and his Reds now want is the return to Canada of Bachand.  This highly competent friend of the FLQ and organizer of leftist riots, including the perceived Communist Front of “Opération McGill français” in 1969, might have stirred up violence; and made the PQ’s “democratic option” defunct before it became fully operational.

Trudeau’s execution order targeting Bachand may have had more to do with keeping the PQ in power to facilitate his own planned negotiations with his Communist friend, Lévesque to restructure Canada.  This obviously was the aim at that time, and still is:  there is no other purpose to the Communist PQ.  Had Bachand stirred up social unrest and violence, the PQ would have come to an untimely end as a credible “political” alternative to the FLQ approach for taking Quebec out of Canada.

Thus, Bachand’s alleged intent to assassinate Trudeau might well have been a facade for the real objective:  protecting the Communist and terrorist-filled ranks of the Liberals’ “political solution,” the PQ, from disintegration.

Bachand:  the Kennedy “French Connection”?

Silverthorne has written up her theory that Bachand was the famed “French connection”, with astonishing pictures of BACHAND and OSWALD (above) at her web site, named for President John F. Kennedy’s proposed site of America’s first tidal power dam for cheap and plentiful energy:  the Passamaquoddy.  Her story is here:

Dream of Passamaquoddy

Adding my own speculation to the Silverthorne scenario:  if Fidel Castro ordered the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, he may have used François Mario Bachand — masked as an “FLQ” terrorist — to do (some of) the shooting, and Castro’s lifelong best friend Trudeau may have then closed the JFK file by having Bachand executed.

Bachand’s name comes up on the FLQ timeline at Wikipedia, which places Bachand in Cuba on several occasions in the years after the Kennedy shooting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Front_de_libération_du_Québec

This item on the Timeline is intriguing:

1971:

March 24, Solicitor General Jean-Pierre Goyer, Director General of the RCMP Security Service John Starnes and Deputy Solicitor General Ernest Côté meet.  Goyer orders Starnes to “neutralize” Mario Bachand [murder, assassinate, kill a Canadian citizen extra-judicially], in Paris, an operation that had been planned since February.  A heated exchange ensues; “Starnes objected that it would be pointless and hazardous and that the service was incapable of it.”  Goyer says he would consult with the Prime Minister.[22]

Footnote 22 cites a credible source:  McLoughlin, Michael.  “Last Stop, Paris:  the assassination of Mario Bachand and the death of the FLQ” (Viking, Toronto: 1998), p. 218.

Note the latter half of that title, “the death of the FLQ”.  As I theorize above, organizer Bachand may have been ordered killed to keep the PQ in power, by obstructing the return of the FLQ.

Indeed, journalist Louis Fournier notes:

[Translation:]  “[…] the death of François Mario Bachand coincided with an unprecedented offensive of the information and security services against any attempt to relaunch the F.L.Q.

Fournier also declares:

[Translation:]  Two major theories may explain the death of Francois Bachand:  either he was “executed” by a commando of former comrades in disagreement with him, as a settling of accounts which would be absolutely unique in the whole history of the F.L.Q.; or he was taken down in a special operation of the police security and information service.

That latter operation would have been run by Trudeau-appointee and fellow Iron-Curtainer, Jean-Pierre Goyer. 2

The identity of Bachand’s executioners is unknown, although Fournier gives this account of the possible penetration of Bachand’s residence by camouflaged security agents:

[Translation:]  In Paris, Bachand was living with a young arts Professor from Occitan University, Pierre Barral, [401] who had links with the “Mouvement pour la défense des prisonniers politiques québécois” [“Movement for the defence of the Québécois political prisoners”, meaning the F.L.Q. terrorists:KM].  Very few people are aware of his refuge at Saint-Ouen, other than a few contacts he believed he could trust such as François Dorlot, a militant of the P.Q. close to the F.L.Q. at the start of the 1960s.  Bachand was aware, however, for some time, that he was being followed; he had told his sister Michèle, a member of the executive of the M.D.P.P.Q. that he believed so, and his friend Clermont Bergeron of the C.S.N. who had come from Montreal to see him a few days before his death.

[…]

[Translation:]  According to the testimony of Professor Barral, when Bachand was away from the flat, the night before his assassination, two young people called on him, one of whom seemed to be disguised as a female transvestite.  They said they had fled Quebec and that they needed help.  They told Barral:  “François doesn’t know us personally, but we know him.”

However, what is truly remarkable about Bachand’s execution  whether it was carried out by Trudeau and the RCMP or not (and it was murder of a Canadian, if it was) is that it was “ordered” by an elite Communist, Jean-Pierre Goyer.  Goyer’s appointment by Communist Trudeau as head of Canada’s national police is discussed by American anti-Communist Alan Stang in an extract of his 1971 article at my blog:

https://nosnowinmoscow.wordpress.com/videos/stang-part-3/

Wrote Stang:

“Another thing you need if you are imposing a dictatorship is control of the police.  In Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are controlled by the Solicitor-General.  So Trudeau made Jean-Pierre Goyer the Solicitor-General — when Parliament was not in session and could not question him.  Goyer, it goes without saying, was a regular contributor to Cité Libre.  Isn’t everybody?  He was once arrested for staging a sit-in outside the office of the Premier of Quebec.  He has been involved in several pro-Communist frontsAnd he has attended Communist meetings behind the Iron Curtain.  Like his friend Trudeau, he is a revolutionary.

This is the man now running the national police of Canada.”

So, the man “running the national police of Canada” ordered the execution of an Oswald look-alike (Bachand) who frequented the Castro-founded FLQ & was bailed out (in sufficient time to be able to shoot JFK, if that was his mission); and Goyer did so in final consultation with Castro’s best friend, Pilgrim of Moscow Pierre Elliott Trudeau.

Jean-François Lisée (the current Communist leader of the Communist Parti Québécois, elected on 7 October 2016), confirms in his 1990 book, Dans l’Oeil de l’Aigle that Bachand was intimate with Cuba prior to 1970 for at least a year and a half:

[Translation:] Three Felquists in a hurry to know all about guerilla techniques (François Bachand, Raymond Villeneuve and Gaston Collin) had already spent some 18 months in Cuba prior to 1970.  There again, Langley had presented to the Secret Service representatives a defector who had told somewhat alarming stories about the training the Cubans were giving to the Quebecers.  The CIA believed the testimony was reliable, but in Ottawa, the Mounties had their doubts.  “We know from people who had seen them, that the Felquists in Cuba had no training, they were playing billiards in the hotel,” said one Canadian officer.”*

I, for one, doubt the “doubts” of the Mounties, which do not seem rational in the circumstances.  François Mario Bachand and other terrorist leaders did not go to Cuba to play pool in the hotel lounge.

The assassination of Cuba-trained Bachand in effect protected the Communist subversion of Quebec, and Canada, and of North America, as currently then organized in the hands of the corporate fascists behind the secret committee at Power Corporation.  This cabal, with links to the Red-friendly Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) which co-financed the 1917 Bolshevik “revolution”, had orchestrated the set-up of the Communist Parti Québécois.  Power Corporation then had financed Communist Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s federal election campaign.  It was clearly intended that Trudeau “negotiate” with “his own” Communist PQ to restructure Canada for Communism.

It is therefore my view that François Mario Bachand may well have been a marksman; he may have been recruited by Cuba locally; and he may well have been in Texas on the infamous day.  Bachand most surely would have upset the “bourgeois” Communist apple cart of Power Corporation’s designer “political” party, the Parti Québécois, Power’s ultimate vehicle for dismantling and restructuring all of North America for corporate-fascist world government.
______
 
1  Just how “Red” was Pierre Elliott Trudeau?  Read my exclusive English translation of Trudeau’s 7-part series for Le Devoir  on the 1952 Moscow “economic” summit organized by V.V. Kuznetsov of Soviet Intelligence:  “I’m Back From Moscow“.
 
2  Killing a Canadian citizen outside the law is hardly an “operation”.  It is cold-blooded murder, for which those who discussed and planned it are culpable, whether they carried it out, or not.  Goyer, Trudeau, and Starnes all should have been charged and tried at least for intent.

– 30 –

 

Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism with Ben Wattenberg (Think Tank)

In large part, Canada has America to thank for our little headache up here with socialism. This neat historical film identifies the “grass roots” of the CCF and the NDP in a well produced and interesting 5 minutes 19 seconds.

There is a marvelous web site for the film, with all kinds of resources: http://www.heavenonearthdocumentary.com/index.html

Visit and enjoy it!  But watch this, first!

TRANSCRIPT

[ Voice of ROBERT BOTHWELL, Author, Canada and the United States: ]

As the Socialist Party faded from the U.S. political scene, some of the farmers who had embraced its ideals would take their politics north, to Canada.

Today, Americans think of Canada as a lot more radical, a more socialist place. But the irony is that Canada’s first socialist politicians, Canada’s first socialist intellectuals, are Americans. And that is something that people today have forgotten. Uh — socialism, when it comes to Canada — in an effective way, is an American import.
 

[ Moderator: ]

Between 1898 and 1915, nearly a million people emigrated from America to Canada. Lured by cheap farmland, most settled in the Western Canadian Provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba: the last North American frontier.

They brought their knowledge of how to wrest a living from the soil, and a set of political convictions rooted in their experience.
 

[ Voice of Robert McMath, Author, American Populism: ]

Farmers in the Prairie Provinces of Canada and the northern Great Plains of the United States all faced similar problems in the early 20th Century. They were all growing wheat. They felt that they were being gouged by the railroads, by the bankers. They felt that the market conditions were working against them.

Rather than seeing this in terms of impersonal market forces, they personalized it and viewed bankers, railroad men, lawyers as the enemy.
 

[ Voice of ROBERT BOTHWELL, Author, Canada and the United States: ]

The way you express your protest at the turn of the Century is, “Hey, wait a minute, why don’t we nationalize these things?”

And from that, as the institutions resist, you move fairly logically and pretty quickly towards radicalism.

And they’re radicalized in Canada in the same way, by the same people, and the same organizations, as they are in the United States. But let me emphasize, these organizations start not in Canada, but in the United States.
 

[ Moderator: ]

Every major U.S. farmer’s organization would resurface in Canada in some form. By the 1920s, these organizations and their successors began to make their voices heard throughout the Prairie Provinces.
 

[ Voice of Robert McMath, Author, American Populism: ]

They were very soon able to influence electoral politics in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, simply by the power of their numbers.

But it’s really not until the Great Depression begins on the Prairies, really in the 1920s, not the 1930s, with drought, with the collapse of the wheat market, that farmers began to contemplate forming their own, independent political force.
 

[ Moderator: ]

In 1932, a new political party emerged from a conference in Saskatchewan, the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation. The CCF.
 

[ Voice of ROBERT BOTHWELL, Author, Canada and the United States: ]

The CCF is a kind of Big Bang among radical groups. Radical farmers, socialist labor unions, and radicalized socialist intellectuals, many in the universities, many also in the Protestant churches. And they get together, and they write a platform that calls for the socialization, essentially, of the means of production and the means of finance.

I mean, it’s, it is a classic socialist platform.

The party would later moderate its platform to appeal to a broader base. In 1944, the CCF swept the provincial elections in Saskatchewan, becoming the first socialist government in North America, and leaving a lasting imprint on Canadian politics.
 

[ Voice of ROBERT BOTHWELL, Author, Canada and the United States: ]

Well, CCF stayed in power in Saskatchewan until 1964. And one of its last acts was to bring in a socialized medicine scheme for the Province of Saskatchewan, which they imposed in the early 1960s and which had such tremendous appeal that it actually pushed Canadian politics in that direction later in the 1960s.

The CCF’s ideas were adopted by the governing Liberal party of Canada, amd the Liberals were the ones who finally brought in national medicare in Canada.
 

[ CONCLUSION — Voice of Ben Wattenberg: ]

Socialism found more of a following in Canada than in the United States.

In 1961, the CCF became the New Democratic Party. It is still largely socialist in its convictions, and still a force in Canadian politics.

In America, some of the ideas championed by socialists also found their way into the mainstream. Ideas like unemployment insurance, social security, and the 8-hour work day. But socialism, itself, never took root.

Be sure to join us for the second episode of Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism.

For Think Tank, I’m Ben Wattenberg.

 

Soviet Agent Oscar D. Skelton Recruited Soviet Agent Lester Bowles Pearson into the Civil Service of Canada

Foreword

In his 1982 pamphlet entitled “Inside the Featherbed File? … “, former undercover RCMP Officer, Patrick Walsh, gave a cameo image of Oscar D. Skelton.

Walsh reports that in the “Featherbed” file, other RCMP Officers claim to have established that the “Father of Canada’s Civil Service”, meaning Skelton, was a Soviet agent, a recruit of Louis Kon of the USSR’s infamous Comintern.

Walsh also alludes to a short reference on Skelton in Peter C. Newman’s The Canadian Establishment. Said Walsh:

In his best-seller, The Canadian Establishment, Peter C. Newman gives only a superficial thumbnail sketch of comrade Oscar Skelton: “During the next 16 years, Skelton founded and built up Canada’s External Affairs department and as MacKenzie King’s closest adviser became the most important civil servant in Ottawa.” In his Appendix I dealing with Ottawa’s Mandarins, there is only a mere mention of Skelton’s belonging to the Rideau Club and having taught at Queen’s University, and no mention of his membership in the Canadian-Soviet Friendship Society & how he also enticed* MacKenzie King to join!

Walsh continues:

Skelton was careful to groom only pro-Soviet civil servants in the External Affairs Department. Most of them were being briefed by the Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA), the Canadian branch of the notorious pro-Soviet Institute of Pacific Relations. Many of them (including Lester B. Pearson) saw service in Washington & London where their counterparts were also members of Soviet espionage rings.

According to declassified parts of the infamous Silvermaster spy file, Elizabeth Bentley, an American who had worked for the Soviets in military intelligence defected back to America and was debriefed on a number of occasions, including by the U.S. McCarran Committee and by agents of the New York Office of the FBI in 1951.

Bentley revealed that Lester (akaMike”) Pearson, a “highly placed Canadian government official” in “the Canadian Embassy in Washington” in 1943 and 1944, fed information to Soviet military intelligence (i.e., Bentley, herself) on “top level British policy and political matters” through Hazen Size, a “member of the Canadian Film Board in Washington, D. C.” with whom Pearson was “very friendly in Canada”, the two being “connected with left wing circles in that country”.

“By confidential memorandum dated August 27, 1951, Inspector Bayfield of the RCMP was advised of the identical information provided to the Department of State and the Department of Justice under letters of that date” by Elizabeth Bentley.

Nonetheless, Soviet agent Lester Bowles Pearson, who at some point was President of the infamous Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA) which was “briefing” the pro-Soviets hired by Skelton, rose to become Prime Minister of Canada.

The following black and white archival video footage documents the fact that Red agent, Oscar D. Skelton, recruited Red agent Lester Bowles Pearson into Mackenzie King’s federal civil service.

TRANSCRIPT:

Lester (Mike) Pearson, M.A.

Lester (Mike) Pearson, M.A.


Narrator: Armed with his M.A., Mike (aka Lester Bowles Pearson) returned to Canada, and the next few years found him lecturing in history and coaching sports at the University of Toronto.

But, off in Ottawa, a Dr. O. D. Skelton was Deputy Minister of a new department called External Affairs.

He intruded into the academic life and asked Mike to write a civil service examination.

O. D. Skelton and Lester (Mike) Bowles Pearson

O. D. Skelton and Lester (Mike) Bowles Pearson

Lester Pearson: It was one of the top positions in this new department. And I thought it would be a good thing to write. I didn’t have any particular intention of taking the job. But I thought it’d be interesting to write it. And uh — I never can resist a competition.

Lester (Mike) Pearson, M.A. (class)

Lester (Mike) Pearson, M.A. (class)

Narrator: He won. It was 1927. Mackenzie-King was Prime Minister, and it was Canada’s Diamond Jubilee when Mike Pearson came to Ottawa.

Mackenzie-King was Prime Minister

Mackenzie-King was Prime Minister

Lester Pearson: I was uh — I had rather a kind of a — exalted idea of foreign offices and diplomacy from reading books. And uh, I considered I had achieved a pretty — a position pretty high — of professional distinction. I was now almost a diplomat, and, perhaps I was a little too impressed by my transition.

Parliament Buildings, Ottawa (1927)

Parliament Buildings, Ottawa (1927)

I remember going into the door — through the door at the East Block behind Dr. Skelton and the guard saluted Dr. Skelton smartly and paid no attention to me whatever. I thought, well, obviously, he doesn’t know who I am.

Well, he didn’t pay any attention to me for a good many years.

– 30 –
 

______
* Quite frankly, I doubt that Mackenzie King was “enticed” into the Canadian-Soviet Friendship Society. I think he walked in happily. Nor do I believe he was merely the “docile puppet” that some have made him out to be. King was a long-time protégé of the infamous American financiers of the bloody Bolshevik “revolution” (military coup on Russia) in 1979: the moneybag Rockefellers. The Rockefellers’ oil empire in America was financed by the equally if not more infamous Rothschilds of Europe who also financed the 1917 war of the Jews upon Russia. The Rockefellers maintained a leash on their Liberal poodle Mackenzie King by employing him in between his elected mandates. In a like manner, Power Corporation of Canada today, whose top men sit on the Board and Senate of the CIIA which was briefing the Reds recruited by Skelton, have kept all their own political dogs well fed between stints in the Prime Minister’s Office — (i.e., Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Jean Chrétien, Paul Martin Junior). All these men, as well as other coddled agents of the supercapitalists, have been involved in merging North America into a Leninist regional union). Ed. NSIM.

Read more on Skelton in Patrick Walsh’s “Inside the Featherbed File?“:

 

Marxism and the Problem of a World State

FOREWORD:

The quotations below, taken from the work of Professor Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin, are offered in contemplation of the North American regional (Soviet) Union, extrapolated from the progressive “association” of nations in regional blocs first seen in Europe, emulated in South America and in Africa, and emerging now through deceptive “trade deals” in North America.

The ongoing mass immigration toward that end, the end of “Sovietism” or “communism”, also eradicates national borders while “amalgamating” and eliminating racial nations to whom “sovereignty” has heretofore been ascribed in the context of the “nation state”.

North American Soviet UnionBritannica has this to say about Professor Tunkin:

Grigory Ivanovich Tunkin, (born Sept. 30 [Oct. 13, New Style], 1906, Chamovo, Russia—died Aug. 23, 1993, Moscow), Soviet legal scholar and diplomat who played a major role in formulating Soviet foreign policy as a key adviser to Soviet leaders Nikita Khrushchev and Mikhail Gorbachev.

Tunkin graduated from the Moscow Law Institute in 1935 and received a doctorate from Moscow State University in 1938. He began his diplomatic career in 1939, with postings in such countries as Canada and Korea. From 1952 to 1965 he was head of the Treaties and Legal Division of the Soviet foreign ministry and was involved in both treaty drafting and treaty negotiation. He also taught law at Moscow State University during this period. Tunkin exerted considerable influence in the de-Stalinization movement that prevailed until Khrushchev’s political demise in 1964, and he is credited with initiating the theory of peaceful coexistence between the Soviets and the West.

Specializing in maritime and Antarctic law, Tunkin participated in several significant international law conferences. His published works include Foundations of Modern International Law (1956), Problems of the Theory of International Law (1962), Ideological Struggle and International Law (1967), Theory of International Law (1970), and International Law in the International System (1975). Tunkin also served as a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly. From 1964 to 1988 he was the head of the department of international law at Moscow State University.

A succinct but informative biography of Professor Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin appears under a mint copy of William E. Butler and Vladimir G. Tunkin’s The Tunkin Diary and Lectures, being The Diary and Collected Lectures of G. I. Tunkin at The Hague Academy of International Law published by Eleven International Publishing, 2012 (ISBN 10: 9490947539 / ISBN 13: 9789490947538) offered for sale by Abe Books.

“Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin was a Soviet jurist and diplomat who became a leading international lawyer in the Soviet Union. His interests were always multi-dimensional. From 1957 to 1966, Tunkin led the Soviet Union’s Legal Department of the Foreign Ministry. In 1961, he was President of the United Nations International Law Commission. Tunkin was professor and Chief of the Chair of International Law at Moscow State University’s Faculty of Law. He also served as President of the Soviet Association of International Law, from its founding in 1957 until his death. Tunkin’s textbooks on international law formed the core of the international law curriculum in the USSR for over 40 years. His works continued to have a lasting influence following the dissolution [sic! — so-called] of the USSR. The present volume brings together a set of materials unique to the Tunkin family and of considerable interest to historians of international law, legal doctrine, and international diplomacy. The book opens with recollections of Tunkin by his youngest son, Vladimir Grigorevich Tunkin, prompted by the discovery that Tunkin kept a diary when he traveled abroad. These are followed by the texts of Tunkin’s lectures at The Hague Academy of International Law, delivered on four occasions between 1958 and 1986.”

We are further informed by translator William E. Butler in his Introduction to his own English edition of Professor Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin’s Theory of International Law (Harvard University Press, 1974. ISBN 0-674-88001-3), that:

“From 1942 to 1944, Professor Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin was posted in Canada as counselor of the Soviet Embassy.”

That should suffice to establish the credibility of the quotations below as a reliable mirror of Soviet ideology. These are taken from Tunkin’s own Theory of International Law (supra), in the chapter entitled “The Legal Nature of International Organizations” in the section “Marxism and the Problem of a World State“.

Professor Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin

Professor Grigoriĭ Ivanovich Tunkin:

“Marxism-Leninism links the possibility of a world association of nations first and foremost with the liquidation of capitalism as the last exploitative socioeconomic formation and with the creation of a socialist society.” — p. 374

“The purpose of socialism,” wrote V. I. Lenin, “is not only to eliminate the splintering of mankind into petty states and any isolation of nations; is not only the rapprochement of nations, but also their amalgamation.”31 But in order to create the conditions for this, more than just the liquidation of private ownership and the creation of a socialist state is needed. Lenin pointed out that national and state differences among peoples and countries will last “for a very, very long time even after realization of the dictatorship of the proletariat on a world-wide scale.” — p. 374

“Even on the domestic plane in a number of instances socialism inherits from capitalism such deep roots of national discord and economic, political, and cultural inequality that a considerable time is required to liquidate them. In international relations, naturally, the matter is far more complex. Each state represents both a political and an economic unit. With the various historical strata of contradictions between states and between nationalities are associated a number of economic, political, cultural, and other problems.” — p. 374

“Within the framework of the world socialist system, however, these differences and contradictions gradually are being overcome on the basis of a new socialist social structure and Marxist-Leninist ideology. Various forms of state unions of socialist states are possible on the path to a classless, stateless communist society.” — p. 374

The creation of a world federation or another form of uniting free states and nations is conceivable, therefore, only on the path of liquidating private ownership, exploitation, class and national contradictions, on the path of constructing socialism and communism.” — p. 374

“A United States of the World (and not of Europe),” wrote V. I. Lenin, “is that state form of union and freedom of nations which we link with socialism, as the complete victory of communism does not lead to the final disappearance of any state, including a democratic state.” — p. 374-75

“The causes of war, whose liquidation is the leitmotif of all plans for a world state, bourgeois scholars misrepresent as state sovereignty, whereas the very existence of sovereign states is a natural consequence of the economic structure of society, and both sovereignty and the state will disappear only when this structure is changed.” — p. 375

“The deep roots of wars are found in the economic system and in the specific class structure of society which it determines. Moreover, bourgeois concepts of a world stale originate, and by their class nature can not but originate, from the possibility of creating a world state and liquidating wars without affecting the economic system of capitalism.” — p. 375

AFTERWORD:

The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 41; Volume 2003 edited by D.M. McRae offers a memorable statement ofn Tunkin’s legal value as an expositor of Soviet ideology in the framework of international law.

/ 619

Tunkin’s standing among Soviet international jurists of his vin­tage alone suffices to impart more than passing interest to this edi­tion. From the mid-1950s until he died in 1993, he bestrode Russian

/ 620

international legal scholarship as no jurist since F.F. Martens (1845-1909) had done.3 He outstripped contemporary Soviet jurists by combining distinguished academic appointments at home and abroad with a prominent role in formulating Soviet foreign policy in the post-Stalin era. His scholarly works underwent translation into various languages, including English, French, Spanish, Ger­man, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Vietnamese. More than any other contemporary Soviet international jurist, he could expound authoritatively a theory of international law mirroring Marxist-Leninist ideology and Soviet geopolitical relations from the early 1950s onwards. Most likely, his exposition in the present edition will remain that era’s foremost exposition of Soviet thinking on international law — if not the foremost exposition of Soviet inter­national legal thought generally.

A central pillar of Tunkin’s theory of international law was his conviction that capitalist and socialist countries could coexist under norms of general international law. From 1956, he advanced a theory of “peaceful coexistence,” in which general international legal norms arose through agreement between states.4 As Butler has correctly remarked, this theory underpinned cooperation between capitalist and socialist countries at least until the Soviet Union col­lapsed in 1991.5

More immediately, Tunkin’s theory of “peaceful coexistence” informed his exposition of the international legal issues treated in the present edition.

More on Willy Brandt, René Lévesque and the Socialist International

René Lévesque - Attendez que je me rappelle...

In my post of January 4th, 2015, I published the first English translation of a 1982 letter of René Lévesque to the Socialist International (SI), scooped from the unpublished files of the Parti Québécois by the Fédération des Québécois de souche (FQS).

Let’s take another look at that letter.

The New American (Tuesday, 01 March 2011 15:40) in its article by Christian Gomez (“Involvement of Socialist International in 2011 Protests”), describes the origins of the Socialist International:

“Initially founded in Paris in 1889, the Second (or Socialist) International was led by Friedrich Engels — until his death in 1895 — in conjunction with other leaders. After being dissolved on the eve of the First World War, the SI, although by then committed to the ideals of Leon Trotsky*, reorganized in 1951, serving as an ally to the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact communist satellite republics.”

Source: http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/africa-mainmenu-27/6516-involvement-of-socialist-international-in-2011-protests

Backup @ Calameo: http://en.calameo.com/read/000747447955ecbba25a9

Friedrich Engels was a Socialist who wrote the Communist Manifesto with Karl Marx in 1848.

The New American goes on:

“During its 1962 Congress in Oslo, Norway, the Socialist International officially publicized its aims abroad, declaring, ‘The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government,’ adding, “Membership of the United Nations must be made universal.”

The text of the Declaration of the Socialist International endorsed at the Council Conference held in Oslo on 2-4 June 1962, is online at the web site of the SI, itself.

Source: http://www.socialistinternational.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticleID=2133

Backup @ Calameo: http://en.calameo.com/books/000747447c87ba69f7cac

It says:

“SOCIALISM AND WORLD PEACE

“The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government. As a first step towards it, they seek to strengthen the United Nations so that it may become more and more effective as an instrument for maintaining peace.”

Again, The New American:

“Several years later, in 1976, Willy Brandt — the former Chancellor of West Germany who was forced to resign in 1974 after he was exposed as an agent of the Stasi, the KGB-backed secret police of communist East Germany — became the President of the SI, serving as its longest-running leader from 1976 to 1992….”

 

The Parti Québécois Adheres To The Goal
Of World Government:

With respect to both SI congresses, and in particular to the SI’s “1962 Congress in Oslo, Norway”, we note that René Lévesque, at page 1 of his 1982 letter to SI president Willy Brandt, requesting PQ membership in the Socialist International, specifically states, in the second to last paragraph on that page:

“… le Parti Québécois adhère sans aucune restriction aux principes énoncés dans les déclarations de Frankfort (1951) et d’Oslo (1962).”

“… the Parti Québécois adheres without any restriction to the principles enunciated in the declarations of Frankfort (1951) and Oslo (1962).”

Therefore, in 1982 when René Lévesque attempted to admit the Parti Québécois to the Socialist International, he was expressly assuring them of his support for their plan of world government.

Flattr this

 

But this is no surprise. In his Memoirs published in 1986, René Lévesque entitles a brief sub-chapter, “I Am a Federalist”. In that sub-chapter, he explains that he is a federalist “in world terms“. Here is a compressed extract:

KEY EXCERPT: 17. I Am a Federalist [ … ]

“All of this means that on two or three absolutely essential levels, the nation-state has had its day. It must give up part of its powers and resources to an authority that would be a Security Council for humanity at large. It’s not for tomorrow, of course. But if we want to count on a tomorrow, no other solution is in sight. There, at any rate, is what I think, and what I repeat every time I get a chance, and what I’ll risk saying again here: to put an end to the massacre of innocents, to give children everywhere a minimum of equal opportunities, one cannot be anything but federalist… at least in world terms.”

The chapter section can be viewed online, English edition, as published:

“I Am a Federalist” – chapter section in the Memoirs of René Lévesque (published 1986):
http://en.calameo.com/books/000111790e51d4555c0f5

The original chapter section in French, entitled “Je Suis Fédéraliste” – being a section of a chapter in the Memoirs entitled Attendez que je me rappelle… les Mémoires de René Lévesque (also published in 1986), is online here:

http://en.calameo.com/books/0001117901d697922e1af

The pertinent extract in the French-language Mémoires reads as follows (again, compressed to the point):

“Cela signifie que, sur deux ou trois plans absolument existentiels, l’État-nation a fait son temps. Il lui faudra céder cette portion de ses pouvoirs et de ses ressources à une autorité qui soit un Conseil de Sécurité pour l’humanité tout entière. Ce n’est pas demain la veille, bien sûr. Mais si l’on veut compter sur un demain, quelle autre issue ?

Pour ma part, en tout cas, ce que je pense et que je répète à chaque occasion, et que je me risque à écrire ici : pour mettre un vrai holà au massacre des innocents, pour donner aux enfants de partout un minimum d’égalité des chances, on ne peut qu’être fédéraliste. Mondialement parlant…”

René Lévesque was not a nationalist, a sovereignist or a patriot. He was a known Communist and a globalist.

As René Lévesque asserted in his 1982 letter to Willy Brandt, attempting admission of the Parti Québécois to the Socialist International, “… the Parti Québécois adheres without any restriction to the principles enunciated in the declarations of Frankfort (1951) and Oslo (1962).”

However, the Frankfurt Declaration of 1951, at its article 5, states as follows:

“5. In many countries uncontrolled capitalism is giving place to an economy in which state intervention and collective ownership limit the scope of private capitalists. More people are coming to recognise the need for planning. Social security, free trade unionism and industrial democracy are winning ground. This development is largely a result of long years of struggle by Socialists and trade unionists. Wherever Socialism is strong, important steps have been taken towards the creation of a new social order.”

A moderator of the May 9th, 1972 radio broadcast discussing the Parti Québécois manifesto, online at CBC Archives, (transcribed and translated into English here), quoted then-President of Bell Canada, Mr. Robert Scrivener, as characterizing

“this program as ‘dangerous’, ‘unrealistic’, and who envisioned a kind of ‘Apocalypse of Business’, if ever this program, if ever one attempted to apply this program.”

While the radio hosts and others attempted to link the manifesto to Swedish-style socialism, seasoned businessman and President of the Quebec Employers’ Council, Charles Perreault, declared:

“For all practical purposes here, they are going to give to the Government the role it plays in socialist countries in Eastern Europe. They are going to centralize production, they are going to construct plans – uh – coercive plans – and for all practical purposes, as I said – uh – give to the Government total control. And one must expect that the, the, the economy will progress pretty much like that of the Poles or the Czechs or the East Germans.” (11 min. 01 sec.)

Perreault continued:

“This is clearly a coercive – uh – which ref – uh, which represents the kind of, of – of, uh – of system known in socialist countries.

But surely not, surely not (the kind one finds in) Sweden, and surely not in France, either.” (12 min. 34 sec.)

Narciso Pizarro, a Marxist sociologist interviewed in the same broadcast, and who specializes in trade-unionism, admitted that the Parti Québécois manifesto took its inspiration from “the Yugoslav model“. (2 min. 26 sec.) The former Yugoslavia, of course, was a Communist state under Marshal Tito until his death in 1980. Thus, in 1972, at the time of the Parti Québécois manifesto, the plan for Quebec is admittedly Communist.

The Parti Québécois is therefore obviously Communist.

The referendums in Quebec to “secede” are an obvious device to acquire temporary sovereignty sufficient to sign “treaties” undertaking to destroy that same sovereignty in Communist regionalism subject to world government.

That regionalism, intended to stretch horizontally, East-West, with the “rest of Canada” signing on to the “partnership”, is moreover modeled on the regionalism now unfolded in Europe. At the time of the 1980 Quebec referendum it was called the European Economic Community; at the time of the 1995 Quebec referendum, it had become the European Union. By 2001, Mikhail Gorbachev was calling it “The New European Soviet“.

Both referendums failed — despite attempts to rig the outcome — thus the regionalization of North America was pursued vertically, North-South, by means of so-called “trade” deals to incorporate Canada, the USA and Mexico into a single unit. When NAFTA stalled, 9/11 occurred, conveniently kick-starting the final leg of the forced march to North American…. Soviet Union.

Building A North American CommunityIt should be no surprise that René Lévesque himself called his plan for the re-federation of Canada with a (temporarily) sovereign Quebec both a new “Canadian Union” and a new “Canadian Community.” These designations must be familiar…. they are clearly echoed in the Council on Foreign Relations’ 2005 blueprint for “Building A North American Community,” commonly known as the North American Union. They were also based on the European Economic Community, and the European Union.

Moreover, one of the signatories to the 2005 “Building A North American Community” plan is Pierre-Marc Johnson, leader of the Parti Québécois after Lévesque, and therefore the Communist Premier of Quebec. The North American Union, modeled on the European Union — the “New European Soviet” — must therefore be Communist.

As to who really founded the Parti Québécois — because René Lévesque is just the front man — I’ll give you that in another post another day.
______
* Leon Trotsky, also known as “Lev Bronstein”.

– 30 –

Flattr this

 

UPDATE: FREE DOWNLOAD now available for researchers:

Download a FREE 18-MB copy of QUAND NOUS SERONS VRAIMENT CHEZ NOUS

The 7zip folder contains: (1) the AUDIO TAPE of the French CBC radio show discussing the Manifesto; (2) The Table of Contents of the Manifesto (Translated); (3) an 18-MB PDF file of the manifesto (scanned at the law library of the French University of Montreal; (4) an OCR of the manifesto.

QUAND – The PQ Manifesto – PDF file & OCR.zip

OR:

QUAND – The PQ Manifesto – PDF file & OCR.zip